From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Redeeman Subject: Re: nfs Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:16:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1069089369.5237.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> References: <1068931388.2186.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <20031115214812.GD25876@hvs.envisage.co.za> <3FB8DD83.4030105@insightbb.com> <3FB849B5.1020404@namesys.com> <3FB8F969.E20ED162@amis.com> Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3FB8F969.E20ED162@amis.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Reiserfs Mailinglist the "oldest" kernel i am running is 2.4.22, with reiserfs 3.6, and the newest is now 2.6test9 with reiserfs 3.6 too, and everything works like a charm! i hope reiser4 will do so ;D On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 17:38, Eric Whiting wrote: > 2.4 kernels with reiserfs 3.5 will still have NFS troubles. Just make sure you > do not have this combination. > > eric > > > Hans Reiser wrote: > > >> > > >> Several moons ago, there were problems with reiserfs and NFS, as > > >> reiserfs didn't (still don't?) have the notion of inodes, which is > > >> used in NFS for filehandle information. there were a quick work around > > >> which didn't work that well, but the current 2.4.x kernels and > > >> Reiserfs 3.6 > > >> works sofar without troubles. > > > > > > > > The described problems were more like years ago than moons ago, however, > > there were some kernels a few moons ago that had NFS problems not due to > > reiserfs code just to keep things in a nice state of chaos for the > > users..... > > > > -- > > Hans -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments