All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Schmidlkofer <kernel@pacrimopen.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:01:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1069736477.1552.11.camel@menion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031124100534.24941.qmail@web13902.mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 02:05, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> >Hello All!
> >
> >Has anyone else experienced a drastic drop in read performance on
> >software
> >RAID-0 with post 2.4.20 kernels? We have a few Athlon XP's here at our
> >lab with double IDE disks on different channels set up as RAID-0. Some
> >bonnie++ benchmark results with various kernels, on the same machine
> >(Athlon XP 2400+, 2 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM, VIA chipset, 2*Maxtor 120 GB
> >6Y060L0):
> >write read
> >2.4.20-ac1: 88,000 135,000 K/sec
> >2.4.21-pre7: 93,000 75,000
> >2.4.22-ac4: 94,000 82,000
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  I can attest a similar drop in read performance on a IA64 box going
> from a 2.4.19ish kernel to 2.4.22. In our setup the RAID0 is LVM, not
> MD.The RAID is used a a scratch device for a out-of-core finite element
> program (NASTRAN).
> 
>  The setup is some 20 disks on 4 controllers. "iozone" read/reread
> Performance went from about 400MB/sec to 260 MB/sec, while write went
> up a notch. Unfortunatelly the read performance is more important for
> the application in question.
> 
>  Due to the fact that I have no controll over the use of the system I
> cannot make any experiments to find out what killed performance. Sorry
> :-(
> 
> Martin
> 
> =====
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Knoblauch
> email: knobi@knobisoft.de or knobi@rocketmail.com
> www:   http://www.knobisoft.de
> 
> 

And this isn't the read-ahead size change thing?


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-25  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-24 10:05 RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 Martin Knoblauch
2003-11-25  5:01 ` Joshua Schmidlkofer [this message]
2003-11-25 13:38   ` Superior disk perf. of 2.4.20-ac (Was: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20) Mikael Johansson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-16 12:51 RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 Martin Knoblauch
2003-12-18 13:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-18 14:37   ` Martin Knoblauch
2004-07-04 23:28     ` Mikael Johansson
2003-12-18 19:13   ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-18 19:17     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-25  9:41 Martin Knoblauch
2003-11-20 16:45 Mikael Johansson
2003-11-21 13:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-21 13:47   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-11-21 19:56   ` Mikael Johansson
2003-12-08 12:47     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-08 12:47       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-08 13:11       ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-12-08 13:11         ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-12-08 13:21         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-08 13:21           ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1069736477.1552.11.camel@menion.home \
    --to=kernel@pacrimopen.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.