All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anton@korzh.ru (Anton A. Korzh)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: i2c for 2.6.0-test11
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070262587.12645.6.camel@phoebus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1070258710.3218.9.camel@phoebus>

? ???, 01.12.2003, ? 09:20, Jean Delvare ?????:
> > sensors-detect gives following positive results:
> > 
> > Driver `lm80' (should be inserted):
> >   Detects correctly:
> >   * Bus `SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000' (Algorithm unavailable)
> >     Busdriver `i2c-viapro', I2C address 0x2d
> >     Chip `National Semiconductor LM80' (confidence: 3)
> >  
> > Driver `via686a' (should be inserted):
> >   Detects correctly:
> >   * ISA bus, undetermined address (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
> >     Chip `VIA Technologies VT82C686 Integrated Sensors' (confidence:
> >     9)
> > 
> > sensors gives: 
> > [root@pueblo lm_sensors2]# sensors
> > eeprom-i2c-1-52
> > Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000
> > Algorithm: Unavailable from sysfs
> > Memory type: Unavailable
> >  
> > eeprom-i2c-1-51
> > Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000
> > Algorithm: Unavailable from sysfs
> > Memory type: Unavailable
> > 
> > 
> > What can you recommend me to do?
> > I have compiled i2c-dev,i2c-isa,i2c-viapro, all i2c chips(But there
> > are no lm80). Sysfs is mounted to /sys
> 
> Well, the lm80 driver hasn't been ported to Linux 2.6 yet, so you'll
> have to wait. If you are brave, you can port it yourself. I wrote a
> guide on how to do this, which should be part of Linux 2.6
> Documentation/i2c directory someday (but isn't yet either). I can send
> it to you if you want.

thanks i ll consider about doing it

> As for the via686a, it has been reported that it has to be loaded before
> other i2c drivers, or it fails detecting devices. I've experienced this
> myself. I've not yet investigated why it behaves that way (mainly
> because the via686a chipset I have isn't wired for proper input
> measurements). Again, feel free to help if you can, or you'll have to
> wait until we find a solution.

Do i understand correctly that i need to compile all that i2c stuff in
modules and load via686a module first - that will help?

And is that true that i need either lm80 working either via686a? I need
either ISA either SMbus sensors, or there will be some difference.



Merci de votre assistance,

Anton.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-19  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-19  6:24 i2c for 2.6.0-test11 Anton A. Korzh
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Anton A. Korzh [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070262587.12645.6.camel@phoebus \
    --to=anton@korzh.ru \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.