From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Redeeman Subject: Re: production use of reiserfs Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:19:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1070291978.4355.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> References: <200311280846.12697.ivan@t1.unisoftbg.com> Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200311280846.12697.ivan@t1.unisoftbg.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Reiserfs Mailinglist this is strange, i feel that the linux filesystems is much more unstable after a power failure than windows filesystens, but in advance they are much faster. but ofcourse, windows filesystems are made to be crash proof. i have run into a crash with reiserfs, it didnt work, rebuild tree fixed it perfect though On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:46, ivan wrote: > Hi all, > > We are collecting our statistic for the last 9 m. of using linux + postgreSQL > as oracle+windows alternative in production. > > We are using linux redhat (7.3 and 9.0) + reiserfs (it was recomendet as > stable and fast). > > For this time we have 6 filesystem crashes (all after powerdown) with total > database lose. > > It is very bad situation because for this period we do not have any problems > with windows + oracle. > > So it is now time to see if resierfs is production ready or we need to change > the filesystem (or OS distro). > > My question: > > exist somewath special in reiserfs setup on redhat, that we need to change? > We are using the standart install (linux reiserfs). > > We do not make changes on kernel or setup. > > Is it good idea to change redhat? > > Also it is possible to use redhat AS 3.0, but we do not find any info how to > instsall it with reiserfs. Exist any problems on this distro? > > regards, > ivan. -- Regards, Redeeman () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments