From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Hello -- complicated firewal :(
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070344266.4549.31.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031201124713.3fea02c6.mgale@utilitran.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2143 bytes --]
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 21:47, Michael Gale wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using iptables for a while but only in simple setups. Now I have been given the task to setup a major enterprise level firewall.
>
> This firewall has 22 external virtual IP addresses plus one primary internal and external IP. Oh it also has 1 virtual IP on the internal as well.
>
> So right now I have two firewalls running a master and slave cluster - which every one is master listens on it's external and internal primary IP's for connections from me only so I can administer it.
>
> Plus then the master will listen on the 22 virtual IP's for DNAT them to the severs on the DMZ.
>
> The slave will only listen for traffic on the external and internal primary IP's so I can administer it.
>
> For a failover to be transparent the internal NIC of the master will listen on 172.16.0.1 and this is the internal networks gateway. This is NOT the primary IP of either firewall.
>
> OK my question is .. when my master is up on firewall-1 it will listen on 172.16.0.1 (internal network default gateway) and 172.16.0.2 (primary INTERNAL IP used only for administration)
>
Why do you need a virtual IP for administration? One IP on the internal
should be sufficient.
Use an INPUT rule to allow only your IP to administer the firewall:
iptables -P INPUT DROP
.
.
.
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 22 -s <your_ip> -d 172.16.0.1
-j ACCEPT
> How can I make it so internal users can only use 172.16.0.1 as a internet gateway and NOT 172.16.0.2.
> >From my knowledge the FORWARD chain can only filter on source and destination address -- I would think I would have to filter out based on what IP the packet was forwarded to ... but how ?
>
> I hope this is clear -- I tried looking for help on some IRC channels and nobody understood what I was talking about.
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-02 5:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 19:47 Hello -- complicated firewal :( Michael Gale
2003-12-02 5:51 ` Ray Leach [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-01 20:31 Daniel Chemko
2003-12-03 1:12 ` Michael Gale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070344266.4549.31.camel@raylinux.internal \
--to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.