From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265283AbTLGA3r (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:29:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265284AbTLGA3r (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:29:47 -0500 Received: from c-130372d5.012-136-6c756e2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([213.114.3.19]:8082 "EHLO pomac.netswarm.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265283AbTLGA3o (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 19:29:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found? From: Ian Kumlien To: Craig Bradney Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1070756427.2093.2.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> References: <1070739194.1985.4.camel@big.pomac.com> <1070756427.2093.2.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ayS4zb5QQe6IqCrXqTWE" Message-Id: <1070756987.1987.7.camel@big.pomac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:29:47 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-ayS4zb5QQe6IqCrXqTWE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:20, Craig Bradney wrote: > On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 20:33, Ian Kumlien wrote: > > Hi, i'm now running this patch and it survived my grep in /usr/src. > >=20 > > It's mainly a correction of the apic patch and the ACPI halt disconnect > > patch that was originally done for 2.6... >=20 > Correction? how so? code looks the same, although the line numbers are > completely different for mpparse.c and at that location there is > different code. (Havent checked the disconnect) this is for 2.4.23 =3D) > Or do u just mean combination of the two patches? Combination + for 2.4.23 > > I'll get back to you about uptime, but i think this is it...=20 >=20 > Why do you think the disconnect is also related? (given some are just > running the APIC patch and having (less/)no issues? Since i had issues with just the apic patch, as stated in my mail. > > Although i would prefer a not so workaroundish approach =3D) >=20 > 23 hrs now..=20 I'm at 5:06 and thats a record for it running with apic. --=20 Ian Kumlien -- http://pomac.netswarm.net --=-ayS4zb5QQe6IqCrXqTWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/0nR77F3Euyc51N8RAueFAJwOSQ90trbsMM59VAqXGyJJdkayOgCfQnhy 8EuH+wkkpxfyN5wIR6LMS+c= =c8ed -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ayS4zb5QQe6IqCrXqTWE--