All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 001 of 6] Merge blk_recount_segments into blk_recalc_rq_segments
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:20:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070816112054.12167@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070816211551.11839.patches@notabene


blk_recalc_rq_segments calls blk_recount_segments on each bio,
then does some extra calculations to handle segments that overlap
two bios.

If we merge the code from blk_recount_segments into
blk_recalc_rq_segments, we can process the whole request one bio_vec
at a time, and not need the messy cross-bio calculations.

Then blk_recount_segments can be implemented by calling
blk_recalc_rq_segments, passing it a simple on-stack request which
stores just the bio.

Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
 ./block/ll_rw_blk.c |  102 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c ./block/ll_rw_blk.c
--- .prev/block/ll_rw_blk.c	2007-08-16 17:37:43.000000000 +1000
+++ ./block/ll_rw_blk.c	2007-08-16 17:43:27.000000000 +1000
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static void drive_stat_acct(struct reque
 static void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio);
 static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio);
 static struct io_context *current_io_context(gfp_t gfp_flags, int node);
+static void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq);
 
 /*
  * For the allocated request tables
@@ -1209,16 +1210,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_dump_rq_flags);
 
 void blk_recount_segments(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 {
+	struct request rq;
+	struct bio *nxt = bio->bi_next;
+	rq.q = q;
+	rq.bio = rq.biotail = bio;
+	bio->bi_next = NULL;
+	blk_recalc_rq_segments(&rq);
+	bio->bi_next = nxt;
+	bio->bi_phys_segments = rq.nr_phys_segments;
+	bio->bi_hw_segments = rq.nr_hw_segments;
+	bio->bi_flags |= (1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_recount_segments);
+
+static void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
+{
+	int nr_phys_segs;
+	int nr_hw_segs;
+	unsigned int phys_size;
+	unsigned int hw_size;
 	struct bio_vec *bv, *bvprv = NULL;
-	int i, nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs, seg_size, hw_seg_size, cluster;
+	int seg_size;
+	int hw_seg_size;
+	int cluster;
+	struct bio *bio;
+	int i;
 	int high, highprv = 1;
+	struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
 
-	if (unlikely(!bio->bi_io_vec))
+	if (!rq->bio)
 		return;
 
 	cluster = q->queue_flags & (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER);
-	hw_seg_size = seg_size = nr_phys_segs = nr_hw_segs = 0;
-	bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i) {
+	hw_seg_size = seg_size = 0;
+	phys_size = hw_size = nr_phys_segs = nr_hw_segs = 0;
+	rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq)
+	    bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i) {
 		/*
 		 * the trick here is making sure that a high page is never
 		 * considered part of another segment, since that might
@@ -1244,12 +1271,13 @@ void blk_recount_segments(struct request
 		}
 new_segment:
 		if (BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(bvprv, bv) &&
-		    !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len)) {
+		    !BIOVEC_VIRT_OVERSIZE(hw_seg_size + bv->bv_len))
 			hw_seg_size += bv->bv_len;
-		} else {
+		else {
 new_hw_segment:
-			if (hw_seg_size > bio->bi_hw_front_size)
-				bio->bi_hw_front_size = hw_seg_size;
+			if (nr_hw_segs == 1 &&
+			    hw_seg_size > rq->bio->bi_hw_front_size)
+				rq->bio->bi_hw_front_size = hw_seg_size;
 			hw_seg_size = BIOVEC_VIRT_START_SIZE(bv) + bv->bv_len;
 			nr_hw_segs++;
 		}
@@ -1259,15 +1287,15 @@ new_hw_segment:
 		seg_size = bv->bv_len;
 		highprv = high;
 	}
-	if (hw_seg_size > bio->bi_hw_back_size)
-		bio->bi_hw_back_size = hw_seg_size;
-	if (nr_hw_segs == 1 && hw_seg_size > bio->bi_hw_front_size)
-		bio->bi_hw_front_size = hw_seg_size;
-	bio->bi_phys_segments = nr_phys_segs;
-	bio->bi_hw_segments = nr_hw_segs;
-	bio->bi_flags |= (1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
+
+	if (nr_hw_segs == 1 &&
+	    hw_seg_size > rq->bio->bi_hw_front_size)
+		rq->bio->bi_hw_front_size = hw_seg_size;
+	if (hw_seg_size > rq->biotail->bi_hw_back_size)
+		rq->biotail->bi_hw_back_size = hw_seg_size;
+	rq->nr_phys_segments = nr_phys_segs;
+	rq->nr_hw_segments = nr_hw_segs;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_recount_segments);
 
 static int blk_phys_contig_segment(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
 				   struct bio *nxt)
@@ -3316,48 +3344,6 @@ void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio)
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(submit_bio);
 
-static void blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
-{
-	struct bio *bio, *prevbio = NULL;
-	int nr_phys_segs, nr_hw_segs;
-	unsigned int phys_size, hw_size;
-	struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
-
-	if (!rq->bio)
-		return;
-
-	phys_size = hw_size = nr_phys_segs = nr_hw_segs = 0;
-	rq_for_each_bio(bio, rq) {
-		/* Force bio hw/phys segs to be recalculated. */
-		bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
-
-		nr_phys_segs += bio_phys_segments(q, bio);
-		nr_hw_segs += bio_hw_segments(q, bio);
-		if (prevbio) {
-			int pseg = phys_size + prevbio->bi_size + bio->bi_size;
-			int hseg = hw_size + prevbio->bi_size + bio->bi_size;
-
-			if (blk_phys_contig_segment(q, prevbio, bio) &&
-			    pseg <= q->max_segment_size) {
-				nr_phys_segs--;
-				phys_size += prevbio->bi_size + bio->bi_size;
-			} else
-				phys_size = 0;
-
-			if (blk_hw_contig_segment(q, prevbio, bio) &&
-			    hseg <= q->max_segment_size) {
-				nr_hw_segs--;
-				hw_size += prevbio->bi_size + bio->bi_size;
-			} else
-				hw_size = 0;
-		}
-		prevbio = bio;
-	}
-
-	rq->nr_phys_segments = nr_phys_segs;
-	rq->nr_hw_segments = nr_hw_segs;
-}
-
 static void blk_recalc_rq_sectors(struct request *rq, int nsect)
 {
 	if (blk_fs_request(rq)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-16 11:20 [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:20 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2007-08-16 11:21 ` [PATCH 002 of 6] Introduce rq_for_each_segment replacing rq_for_each_bio NeilBrown
2007-08-17  7:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-18 14:37     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-18 14:30       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-18 14:48         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-20 11:21           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-20 12:46             ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-21  1:38             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-21  7:09               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-21  9:46                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-21  9:52                   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-21 10:41                     ` [PATCH] PS3: Update MAINTAINERS Satyam Sharma
2007-08-21 19:01                       ` Geoff Levand
2007-08-21 20:01                         ` Joe Perches
2007-08-21 20:06                           ` Rene Herman
2007-08-21 20:17                             ` Geoff Levand
2007-08-21 20:33                               ` Rene Herman
2007-08-21 20:48                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-21 20:41                                 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-21 20:47                                 ` Joe Perches
2007-08-21 21:58                         ` Hugh Blemings
2007-08-23 18:14                           ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24  5:52                             ` Hugh Blemings
2007-08-21 20:10                       ` Geoff Levand
2007-08-24  6:25                       ` [Cbe-oss-dev] " Hugh Blemings
2007-08-24  6:47                         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-24  6:48                           ` Hugh Blemings
2007-08-16 11:21 ` [PATCH 003 of 6] Fix various abuse of bio fields in umem.c NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:21 ` [PATCH 004 of 6] New function blk_req_append_bio NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:21 ` NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:21 ` [PATCH 005 of 6] Stop exporting blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:21 ` NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:21 ` [PATCH 006 of 6] Share code between init_request_from_bio and blk_rq_bio_prep NeilBrown
2007-08-16 11:36 ` [PATCH 000 of 6] A few block-layer tidy-up patches Jens Axboe
2007-08-17  0:40   ` Neil Brown
2007-08-17  6:17     ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-17  7:21       ` Neil Brown
2007-08-17 12:37         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1070816112054.12167@suse.de \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.