From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>
In-Reply-To: <9BBB7C9EFEF1874BAC4DC204E867EFAF02560D49@s99mail06>
References: <9BBB7C9EFEF1874BAC4DC204E867EFAF02560D49@s99mail06>
Message-Id: <1070853946.1558.17.camel@avalon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Mon Dec  8 09:44:01 2003
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

Hi again,

On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:14, Little, Chris wrote:
> It also depends on your workload.  If you are serving a large database,
> reiser (the last i heard) is probably a bad choice.

why is that? thought reiser was faster than ext3 while ext3 would be
considered more stable (in general).

Before getting ways off topic: where can I find a good comparison /
discussion on different filesystems?

Thanks for your suggestions

Markus