From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs From: Matt In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <1070897481.9011.38.camel@hotbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Dec 8 09:32:02 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Reiserfs has in some cases better performance. But resiserfs (in 2.4) has NO bad block management capabilities..=20 So, if your drive gets bad blocks, you can very quickly be rebuilding your entire filesystem ( I lost a TB on a RAID where one drive developed some bad blocks.) Just keep in mind stability. Matt Schillinger mschilli@vss.fsi.com On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 08:39, Yanick Quirion wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > Could you please tell what is the best filesystem for linux between ext= 3 and reiserfs? >=20 > I know that ext3 can handle ACLs and not online fs extend, and reiserfs= do not seems to support ACLs (I found some patches for kernel 2.4.21, bu= t there are errors when I apply them to the kernel sources), but can be e= xtend while it's online. >=20 > I'm just asking for your personal opinion and knowledge with them. >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > ----------- > Yanick Quirion > Administrateur R=C3=A9seau/Network Manager > NEOKIMIA INC. > Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke > 3e =C3=A9tage (=C3=89difice Z5) > 3001 12e avenue Nord > Sherbrooke, Qu=C3=A9bec > CANADA > J1H 5N4 > =20 > T=C3=A9l.: +1 819 820-6040 > Direct: +1 819 820-6855 > Fax.: +1 819 820-6841 > =20 > email: Yanick.Quirion@neokimia.com >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/