From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hancock.sc.steeleye.com (stat1.steeleye.com [65.114.3.130]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2E74854 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:00:54 -0700 (MST) Received: from mulgrave-w.il.steeleye.com (il-ppp.sc.steeleye.com [172.17.6.240]) by hancock.sc.steeleye.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id hBCF0ma01844; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:00:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] proposed changes to dino.c From: James Bottomley To: Thomas Bogendoerfer In-Reply-To: <20031212113025.GA4814@solo.franken.de> References: <1071031038.1977.1.camel@mulgrave> <20031210045429.GA18782@colo.lackof.org> <1071093265.1730.27.camel@mulgrave> <20031212074838.GA16885@colo.lackof.org> <20031212113025.GA4814@solo.franken.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 12 Dec 2003 10:00:29 -0500 Message-Id: <1071241233.1814.9.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Grant Grundler , PARISC list List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 06:30, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > doesn't this also break PCI Vis-EG and FX cards setup ? On these > cards the ROM contains PARISC firmware, which we need. Only if we physically need acess to the ROMs from the linux driver after the firmware is used...this is rarely true, even on x86. I'm afraid I only have GSC Vis-EG cards, so I can't test this though. James