From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rddunlap@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: Difference between select and enable in Kconfig
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 18:22:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031220205433.195037e8.rddunlap@osdl.org>
Hi Randy,
> | while porting some of my drivers to 2.6 which use the firmware loader
> | for example I came to the question whether to use select or enable to
> | achieve the desired result. Looking at the documention don't gives me
> | the answer and from zconf.l I feel that both options are the same. Can
> | anyone please explain me the differences if there are any?
>
> I agree, they look like synonyms.
> There's nothing about "enable" in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> and there's evidence in zconf.l (as you mention) and in menu.c
> that they are the same:
>
> case P_SELECT:
> sym2 = prop_get_symbol(prop);
> if ((sym->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym->type != S_TRISTATE) ||
> (sym2->type != S_BOOLEAN && sym2->type != S_TRISTATE))
> fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:warning: enable is only allowed with boolean and tristate symbols\n",
> ~~~~~~
so both options achieve the same result. Why do we have two different
options for the same stuff? Should we not remove one?
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-21 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-21 2:46 Difference between select and enable in Kconfig Marcel Holtmann
2003-12-21 4:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-12-21 17:22 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2003-12-21 17:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-12-21 18:06 ` Marcel Holtmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072027326.2684.72.camel@pegasus \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.