From: Gabor MICSKO <gmicsko@szintezis.hu>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [test] exec-shield vs. paxtest 0.9.5 horrible results
Date: 22 Dec 2003 11:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1072090466.1471.4.camel@gmicsko03> (raw)
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# uname -a
Linux gmicsko03 2.6.0 #1 Thu Dec 18 12:32:44 CET 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# echo 2 >
/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# cat
/proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
2
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5# ./paxtest
PaXtest - Copyright(c) 2003 by Peter Busser <peter@adamantix.org>
Released under the GNU Public Licence version 2 or later
It may take a while for the tests to complete
Test results:
PaXtest - Copyright(c) 2003 by Peter Busser <peter@adamantix.org>
Released under the GNU Public Licence version 2 or later
Executable anonymous mapping : Vulnerable
Executable bss : Vulnerable
Executable data : Vulnerable
Executable heap : Vulnerable
Executable stack : Vulnerable
Executable anonymous mapping (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable bss (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable data (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable heap (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library bss (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library data (mprotect): Vulnerable
Executable stack (mprotect) : Vulnerable
Anonymous mapping randomisation test : 16 bits (guessed)
Heap randomisation test (ET_EXEC) : 14 bits (guessed)
Heap randomisation test (ET_DYN) : 13 bits (guessed)
Main executable randomisation (ET_EXEC) : No randomisation
Main executable randomisation (ET_DYN) : 12 bits (guessed)
Shared library randomisation test : 12 bits (guessed)
Stack randomisation test (SEGMEXEC) : 17 bits (guessed)
Stack randomisation test (PAGEEXEC) : 17 bits (guessed)
Return to function (strcpy) : Vulnerable
Return to function (strcpy, RANDEXEC) : Return to function
(memcpy) : Vulnerable
Return to function (memcpy, RANDEXEC) : Vulnerable
Executable shared library bss : Vulnerable
Executable shared library data : Vulnerable
Writable text segments : Vulnerable
gmicsko03:/home/trey/devel/exploit/paxtest-0.9.5#
Any idea?
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-22 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-22 10:54 Gabor MICSKO [this message]
2003-12-22 11:09 ` [test] exec-shield vs. paxtest 0.9.5 horrible results Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-22 11:25 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1072090466.1471.4.camel@gmicsko03 \
--to=gmicsko@szintezis.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.