From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
Subject: Re: results of my filesystem test, xfs, jfs, ext3 and reiserfs
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:38:40 +0100
Message-ID: <1072096720.4336.0.camel@redeeman.linux.dk>
References: <1072090011.4349.8.camel@redeeman.linux.dk>
	 <200312221329.10711.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-16377-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <200312221329.10711.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Dieter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Cc: Reiserfs Mailinglist <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

i dont know the version of reiserfs, i used reiserfsprogs 3.6.11 to
create it, and a 2.6.0 kernel, i didnt do any patching myself

On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 13:29, Dieter N=FCtzel wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 11:46 schrieb Redeeman:
> > i decided to make a little test between those filesystems, to test spee=
d
> > and stability. i will not include the accurate numbers here as i have t=
o
> > get it together, (my notes are messy :)) but i will tell how it was.
>=20
> Reiser 3.xx _with_ data logging patches (ordered mode) or Reiser4?
>=20
> Greetings,
> 	Dieter
--=20
Regards, Redeeman
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail=20
/\                        - against microsoft attachments