From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264509AbTLVWTz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:19:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264522AbTLVWTz (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:19:55 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([141.154.95.10]:57818 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264509AbTLVWTx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:19:53 -0500 Subject: Re: atomic copy_from_user? From: Rob Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: joe.korty@ccur.com, wli@holomorphy.com, albert@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20031222141431.111e7611.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1072054100.1742.156.camel@cube> <20031222150026.GD27687@holomorphy.com> <20031222182637.GA2659@rudolph.ccur.com> <1072126506.3318.31.camel@fur> <20031222141431.111e7611.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072131587.3318.54.camel@fur> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:19:48 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 17:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > But preempt_enable_no_resched() calls dec_preempt_count(). Yah, Joe just pointed that out. I do not really want to change the base interfaces, anyway ;) I do think we should add an explicit preempt_check_resched() after calls to dec_preempt_count() where we might be delaying a reschedule, though. Rob Love