From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262913AbTLXCWz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:22:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263082AbTLXCWz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:22:55 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([141.154.95.10]:31464 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262913AbTLXCWt (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:22:49 -0500 Subject: Re: DevFS vs. udev From: Rob Love To: Ian Kent Cc: Greg KH , akpm@osdl.org, Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072232566.3826.8.camel@fur> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-8) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:22:46 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 21:21, Ian Kent wrote: > I understand your view but my point here (at this stage) is not > necessarily to revive devfs development but to provide some maintenance > only support for those that need it during the (what appears to be > inevitable) transition. In particular, keeping it around while people > still need it. > > My mother always said I was deaf. Well, good luck to you :) Do not say no one warned you! Rob Love