From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Sandras Subject: Re: GnomeMeeting STUN Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 17:48:42 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1072370922.680.6.camel@golgoth01> References: <1072260947.722.25.camel@golgoth01> <20031224143851.GD941@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20031224143851.GD941@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Le mer 24/12/2003 =E0 15:38, Harald Welte a =E9crit : > On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 11:16:14AM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello Harald, >=20 > Hi Damien. I'm Cc'ing your email to netfilter-devel, since there might > be other developers interested in a discussion about STUN. >=20 That's indeed a nice clarification :) [...] > NAT didn't change at all between 2.4.x and 2.6.x, so there is no change > related to gnomemeeting. >=20 > I assume all we have to offer is ip_conntrack/nat_h323, which is in > patch-o-matic but has been reported not to work with gnomemeeting (but > with netmeeting) in the past ? We'd be happy to receive any feedback > you would have regarding that subject. >=20 I will do my best. I already had sent some information to Joszef a long time ago, but I think it was lost.=20 The problem with the conntrack approach is that we will also have to do the same kind of connection tracker for the SIP protocol :( Thanks for the answer, > > Thank you, > > _ Damien Sandras --=20 _ Damien Sandras (o- =20 //\ It-Optics s.a. v_/_ GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ FOSDEM 2004: http://www.fosdem.org H.323 phone: callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras@seconix.com