From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
Lee Braiden <jel@ntlworld.com>,
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Would setting the CONFIG_RTC option break the powerpc kernel on your machine ?
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:22:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1073460144.784.79.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040107065458.GA20228@iliana>
> BTW, i didn't manage to get the generic RTC code working on my pegasos,
> and i am actually a bit pressed for time.
>
> Do you think a workaround, for the debian powerpc packages, would be to
> add a test for the presence of a pmac in the CONFIG_RTC code, and abort
> if one is found ?
>
> If so, what would be the best way to test for a pmac subarch in the
> drivers/char/rtc.c code ?
will the kernel let you build both drivers in ?
then you can do, in 2.4, something ugly like that:
#ifdef CONFIG_ALL_PPC
if (_machine == _MACH_Pmac)
return -ENODEV;
#endif
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20031216105656.GA5291@iliana>
[not found] ` <1071642293.753.414.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <200312170717.36564.jel@ntlworld.com>
[not found] ` <1071646057.6370.482.camel@gaston>
2003-12-17 9:51 ` Would setting the CONFIG_RTC option break the powerpc kernel on your machine ? Sven Luther
2003-12-17 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-12-17 15:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2003-12-17 16:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-12-17 17:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2003-12-17 16:47 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-17 16:56 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-17 17:06 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-17 17:10 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-17 17:24 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-19 11:40 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-19 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 13:45 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:10 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 16:26 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:33 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 16:48 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:59 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 17:02 ` Mark Guertin
2003-12-22 17:27 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 6:54 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 7:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2004-01-07 7:43 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 7:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 8:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 9:53 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 10:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 10:54 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 11:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 11:53 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 18:34 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-07 7:51 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-07 11:27 ` Volunteer needed : " Sven Luther
2004-01-07 12:28 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-07 14:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-08 7:27 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-08 15:53 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-08 17:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-08 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-08 21:57 ` Sven Luther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1073460144.784.79.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=jel@ntlworld.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=sven.luther@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.