From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] unresolved symbol __do_softirq From: Marcel Holtmann To: jens.carroll@carroll.de Cc: BlueZ Mailing List In-Reply-To: <3FFD4845.3090206@carroll.de> References: <3FFD4845.3090206@carroll.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1073582997.2563.14.camel@pegasus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: bluez-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 18:29:57 +0100 Hi Jens, > I have a problem integrating bluez into a cross complied kernel version > 2.4.20. The target is a arm7tdmi and I used the latest patch for that > kernel. The kernel compilation (bluez as modules) works fine and does > not report any errors. However when I want to insmod the bluez.o I get: > > Using bluez.o > insmod: unresolved symbol __do_softirq > > Well, I am not even sure it is a bluez or a kernel problem. The symbol > __do_softirq is not exported (checked with "cat ksyms | grep __do_softirq"). I am no ARM expert so I can't help you, but from a quick search through the kernel source I saw the __do_softirq is specific for the ARM arch. Try to post this on an ARM mailing list. Regards Marcel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Bluez-devel mailing list Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel