From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266147AbUAQTUB (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:20:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266150AbUAQTUA (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:20:00 -0500 Received: from node-d-1fcf.a2000.nl ([62.195.31.207]:48002 "EHLO laptop.fenrus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266147AbUAQTT6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:19:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] kill sleep_on From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Manfred Spraul Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <40098251.2040009@colorfullife.com> References: <40098251.2040009@colorfullife.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-54ZvOyYNgvRby0MLL5aW" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1074367188.4429.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 20:19:49 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-54ZvOyYNgvRby0MLL5aW Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Any objections against killing it entirely? Or what about marking it as > deprecated, as the first step towards killing it? I have it marked like that in my tree. Lots of warnings... and unfortionately about half are in "new" code so imo we can't mark it deprecated early enough to prevent more of these bugs to enter the kernel. --=-54ZvOyYNgvRby0MLL5aW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBACYrUxULwo51rQBIRAl+zAJ9eYx/lqyNOfF+AU0pckUUUd5RzHwCeIHn/ V96vq612HWSgUDgT3Np3lBE= =eBHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-54ZvOyYNgvRby0MLL5aW--