From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Filip Sneppe Subject: Re: mms and rtsp patches = make modules fail Date: 30 Jan 2004 01:31:13 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1075422674.17013.8.camel@exile> References: <4017BB98.7090203@dsl.pipex.com> <1075368500.18100.7.camel@exile> <40190E1F.6090700@dsl.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <40190E1F.6090700@dsl.pipex.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andy Furniss Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 14:43, Andy Furniss wrote: > I just tested on a different machine, same old distro, though. > > vanilla 2.4.24(I didn't patch this time) same POM (3 days old now) did > ./runme extra (last time I did make dep first) > > and said y to connlimit nth quota u32 connbytes mms-conntrack-nat > rtsp-conntrack string and it said this - With these patches, my 2.4.24 compiles fine when doing a "make SUBDIRS=net/ipv4/netfilter modules" > Already applied: connlimit nth quota u32 connbytes conntrack-seqfile > conntrack_arefcount conntrack_locking conntrack_nonat mms-conntrack-nat > netfilter-docbook owner-socketlookup owner-supgids ownercmd > rtsp-conntrack string Where do conntrack-seqfile, conntrack_arefcount, and these other patches come from ? You must have selected them at one point in time during a POM run, as they don't get applied automatically. The list of patches mentioned in "Already applied: " step on each other - in fact, in current CVS, POM warns against this and one can only apply them all by forcing POM to apply some of them. I get a compilation error afterwards, not the same as you, but this probably depends on the order in which these patches have been applied on our systems. > make mrproper (should I do this here?) It's ok to do a make mrproper here Regards, Filip