From: Sommarnatt <sommarnatt@nwn.se>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing UDP Packets?
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:44:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1075452260.401a196424a17@nwn.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075400687.40194fef0b12f@nwn.se>
Quoting Damion de Soto <damion@snapgear.com>:
> Sommarnatt wrote:
> >
> > I've downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script:
> >
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \
> > match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3
> There is no flowid 1:3 in the default script. was that supposed to be 1:30 ?
Yes it seems I didn't copy it right. Changed it to 1:10.
> > I'm now quite sure about everything in the script - all I want is to
> prioritize
> > the UDP traffic, so that it always gets sent and recieved.
> > What should I remove / add?
> The above rule matches tcp traffic and puts it in the low priority queue (if
> you used
> 1:30).
> I guess this would therefore make UDP faster.
> you might also want to try putting UDP in flow 1:10
>
> This won't affect download UDP traffic though, the wondershaper
> only shapes outbound (sent) traffic, and polices inbound (received) traffic.
> If you want to prioritize downloaded UDP traffic, you'll need to use 2
> network
> interfaces, or play around with the IMQ device.
> (or one of the other suggestions that have been discussed recently)
Alright. I'll have to read the howto on this, haven't had the time yet :/
Thanks for your help!
>
> regards
>
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Damion de Soto - Software Engineer email: damion@snapgear.com
> SnapGear - A CyberGuard Company --- ph: +61 7 3435 2809
> | Custom Embedded Solutions fax: +61 7 3891 3630
> | and Security Appliances web: http://www.snapgear.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> --- Free Embedded Linux Distro at http://www.snapgear.org ---
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-29 18:24 [LARTC] Prioritizing UDP Packets? Sommarnatt
2004-01-30 7:23 ` Damion de Soto
2004-01-30 8:44 ` Sommarnatt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1075452260.401a196424a17@nwn.se \
--to=sommarnatt@nwn.se \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.