From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262745AbUBDPON (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:14:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262913AbUBDPON (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:14:13 -0500 Received: from kiuru.kpnet.fi ([193.184.122.21]:60318 "EHLO kiuru.kpnet.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262745AbUBDPOK (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:14:10 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.2 aka "Feisty Dunnart" From: Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4stbacka?= To: John Bradford Cc: Kernel Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <200402041503.i14F3Bdq000287@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> References: <40210578.6000504@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk> <200402041503.i14F3Bdq000287@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075907649.23288.1.camel@midux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:14:09 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:03, John Bradford wrote: > There was some discussion on the list about dropping version numbers > altogether during 2.7: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107174577415393&w=2 Like it isn't hard enough already? You mean something like Smoking beaver.Out of detox.While running? Markus