From: Ray Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
To: Netfilter Mailing List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: Per connection transfer rate matching
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 09:28:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1075966119.5355.0.camel@raylinux.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877jz2iiil.fsf@iki.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1894 bytes --]
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 00:31, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote:
> I have recently trying to find a solution to a QoS problem of sorts.
>
> What I would wish to be able to do, is to mark a connection based on
> the data transfer rate in that connection. That is, to have some sort
> of a token bucket filter or rate estimator attached to a certain
> connection tracking connection - and to be able to use that in
> netfilter rules.
>
> An example problem case is trivial. Let's assume we have an
> interactive transfer class, which has several interactive sessions
> where latency is tried to be kept to a minimum. Occasionally some
> interactive session might start transferring a lot of data - in which
> case it should be scheduled into the maximum throughput class,
> forgetting latency, until it doesn't transfer that much and it should
> be returned to the interactive class again.
>
> The 'connbytes' match in the patch-o-matic matches on cumulative
> transfer amounts on a per connection basis. The 'limit' match matches
> packets on a simple token bucket implementation. Combining these two
> to something which matches bytes on a simple token bucket per
> connection would create the desired result.
>
Could you not do it then by using two user defined chains, one for limit
match and one for connbytes?
> So, does such a thing exist already? If not, do other people see this
> as useful as I do? Or have I missed something crucial?
>
> And finally, if it doesn't exist already, making such a module
> shouldn't be too hard - would anyone be willing to undertake such an
> ordeal?
>
> -- Naked
--
--
Raymond Leach <raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za>
Network Support Specialist
http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za
"lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import"
Key fingerprint = 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28
--
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-05 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-04 22:31 Per connection transfer rate matching Nuutti Kotivuori
2004-02-05 7:28 ` Ray Leach [this message]
2004-02-10 18:02 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1075966119.5355.0.camel@raylinux.internal \
--to=raymondl@knowledgefactory.co.za \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.