From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:17:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10763.1304349435@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200." <20110502111337.GA15769@sepie.suse.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 460 bytes --]
On Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200, Michal Marek said:
> +# We test for support of the -Wunused-but-set-variable option, because
> +# some version of gcc will happily accept any -Wno-* switch and complain
> +# later during build.
> +ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -Wunused-but-set-variable), y)
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
> +endif
Do we need to do this more generically for all the other -Wno-foo
options under the various W={123} options?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 2:18 linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 2:24 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:02 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 4:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:36 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 5:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 11:13 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 12:13 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+ Michal Marek
2011-05-03 0:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-03 8:52 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 15:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-02 15:31 ` linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Michal Marek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-30 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-05 3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-06 4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-07 5:38 ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-05-26 8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-03 23:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-04 1:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-09-09 0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 23:13 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-19 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23 0:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-12-20 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 13:01 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-09 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-10 6:47 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-14 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-10 22:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-11 0:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-12-11 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-30 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-01 2:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2010-12-23 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:24 ` Michal Marek
2010-09-30 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:25 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10763.1304349435@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.