From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ray Leach Subject: Re: Anybody heard about UP&P ? Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:13:43 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <1077387223.25167.37.camel@raylinux.internal> References: <4035B3BC.6030901@randodetente.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bHKLwwnLzh4Nxd3YA+VH" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4035B3BC.6030901@randodetente.org> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Netfilter Mailing List --=-bHKLwwnLzh4Nxd3YA+VH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 09:14, Marc Recht=E9 wrote: > To enable remote assistance from Internet of a WinXP PC on a LAN using=20 > NAT one must have a UP&P NAT compatible router. >=20 Errr ... no! UPnP is a way for a network device to tell other network devices who ask what port a specific service is on. Remote assistance uses port 3389 IIRC ... > Can Netfilter act as such a router, and if so do you have an idea of the=20 > chain to apply ? >=20 No. > Thanks for your help >=20 > Marc. --=20 -- Raymond Leach Network Support Specialist http://www.knowledgefactory.co.za "lynx -source http://www.rchq.co.za/raymondl.asc | gpg --import" Key fingerprint =3D 7209 A695 9EE0 E971 A9AD 00EE 8757 EE47 F06F FB28 -- --=-bHKLwwnLzh4Nxd3YA+VH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAN5/Xh1fuR/Bv+ygRAh7LAKCXTCESfjfNBKpaSLL1wXPSqa+zDgCeM/+h MiPFX0dBzssjT3qB/4xg0m0= =iGwD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bHKLwwnLzh4Nxd3YA+VH--