From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hancock.sc.steeleye.com (stat1.steeleye.com [65.114.3.130]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D374840 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:42:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from midgard.sc.steeleye.com (midgard.sc.steeleye.com [172.17.6.40]) by hancock.sc.steeleye.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id i1SMgva03934; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:42:58 -0500 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.6 jejb From: James Bottomley To: Joel Soete In-Reply-To: <40411464.6050201@tiscali.be> References: <20040228212407.DB126494190@palinux.hppa> <40411464.6050201@tiscali.be> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 28 Feb 2004 16:42:43 -0600 Message-Id: <1078008164.1968.94.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: PARISC list List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 16:21, Joel Soete wrote: > Hey interesting, I mean 'torture test'. Where can I get more detail on this stuff to test on the N4K also? It just means running bk doing a tree merge, checking out the results and compiling the kernel. It seems to sow up most types of problems ... James