From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: bryan.wu@analog.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu arch dont zero the anonymous mapping by adding UNINITIALIZE flag
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10785.1175247540@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175226172.15391.66.camel@roc-desktop>
Wu, Bryan <bryan.wu@analog.com> wrote:
> It takes lots of time in malloc()->mmap()->do_mmap_private()->memset(). When
> malloc a big area, memset() the area to zero makes the performance very bad.
Ummm...
How do you then cope with attempting to run that same application under
MMU-mode Linux? Won't MMU mmap() give EINVAL? If so, then that'd be grounds
for NAK'ing this patch in the form given.
My theory is that NOMMU binaries should run just as well under an MMU-mode
kernel as under a NOMMU kernel.
What you're asking for is also a security risk - though obviously on NOMMU-mode
one that's fairly irrelevant. It might even make a lot of sense there to move
the clearance into uClibc where possible rather than doing it in the kernel.
On MMU-mode kernels, the option should just be ignored.
I'd also recommend you stick a 'D' on the end of 'MAP_UNINITIALIZE' or may be
call it MAP_UNCLEARED'. But that's a minor point, but you're not telling
mmap() to go and uninitialise the memory...
Lastly, why do you actually need VM_UNINITIALIZE at all? The flag is only used
in a place where MAP_UNINITIALIZE is still available (okay, you'll have to hand
it down as an extra argument). That looks like a waste of a VM_xxx flag, and
we don't have that many to spare.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-30 3:42 [PATCH] nommu arch dont zero the anonymous mapping by adding UNINITIALIZE flag Wu, Bryan
2007-03-30 3:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-03-30 9:39 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-03-30 10:34 ` Aubrey Li
2007-03-30 11:24 ` David Howells
2007-03-30 13:44 ` Aubrey Li
2007-03-30 14:56 ` Alan Cox
2007-03-30 14:38 ` Aubrey Li
2007-03-30 15:11 ` David Howells
2007-03-30 15:46 ` Aubrey Li
2009-10-13 7:44 ` [PATCH] NOMMU: fix malloc performance by adding uninitialized flag Mike Frysinger
2009-10-13 10:10 ` David Howells
2009-10-13 11:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Mike Frysinger
2009-10-13 13:03 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-13 16:03 ` David Howells
2009-10-13 21:31 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Frysinger
2009-10-13 23:04 ` David McCullough
2009-10-14 0:25 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-10-13 15:20 ` [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] NOMMU: fix malloc performance by addinguninitialized flag Robin Getz
2007-03-30 18:13 ` [PATCH] nommu arch dont zero the anonymous mapping by adding UNINITIALIZE flag Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10785.1175247540@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.