From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Subject: Re: delayed file deallocation?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:15:32 -0500
Message-ID: <1079360131.4183.412.camel@watt.suse.com>
References: <20040315074452.GG19159@exavio.com.cn>
	 <200403151257.47145.reiser@bitshadow.namesys.com>
	 <1079358480.8748.384.camel@watt.suse.com>  <4055B888.1070407@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-17221-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <4055B888.1070407@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@bitshadow.namesys.com>, Isaac Claymore <clay@exavio.com.cn>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 09:07, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >Intel, suse and a few others are doing latency tests on 2.6 now, things
> >should generally improve over the next few weeks.

> what is Intel's interest?

They are not targeting reiserfs, but the kernel as a whole.  I'm
assuming their interest is to make sure linux works on big hardware so
they can sell more of it ;-)

Look for mail on l-k from Kenneth Chen to get a general idea.

-chris