All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	"Marinos J. Yannikos" <mjy@geizhals.at>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:40:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079624457.2136.26.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hlllycgz3.wl@alsa2.suse.de>

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 10:28, Takashi Iwai wrote:

Hi, Takashi Iwai.

> well, i personally am not against the current preempt mechanism from
> the viewpoint of the audio-processing purpose :)  the implementation
> is relatively clean and easy.

Agreed.

> i think the first one is needed for preemptive kernel, too.
> with these patches, also 0.1-0.2ms RT-latency is achieved.

Ohh, interesting.  I'll give these a spin with PREEMPT=y and see.  Thank
you!

	Robert Love



  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-18 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-18  4:00 CONFIG_PREEMPT and server workloads Marinos J. Yannikos
2004-03-18  5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18  6:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18  9:50   ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 14:51     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 15:34       ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 16:01         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 17:39       ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 17:58         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 18:26           ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 18:38             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 18:47               ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:01                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 17:48       ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 18:00         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 10:48         ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-19  2:17       ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]         ` <20040319050948.GN2045@holomorphy.com>
2004-03-20 12:14           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 14:51             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-20 15:03               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 15:09                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-24 13:57                 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-24 14:52                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 15:11                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-18 15:20     ` Tom Sightler
2004-03-18 15:37       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 23:54         ` Tom Sightler
2004-03-18 15:39       ` Robert Love
2004-03-18 15:28   ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 15:40     ` Robert Love [this message]
2004-03-18 15:42     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 19:01     ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:08       ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:18         ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:20           ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:43             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 19:50               ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:24         ` Robert Love
2004-03-19 22:03           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-03-19 22:12             ` Robert Love
2004-03-24 15:00               ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:16       ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-18 19:29         ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 19:48           ` Chris Mason
2004-03-19 11:37             ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 13:46               ` Chris Mason
2004-03-19 14:06                 ` Takashi Iwai
     [not found]         ` <20040318221006.74246648.akpm@osdl.org>
2004-03-19 10:30           ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-23  9:14             ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-19 17:22           ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-19 18:03             ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-20 12:24             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-20 13:13               ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-18 19:39       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-18 22:32     ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-18 22:54       ` Chris Mason
2004-03-18 23:57         ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19 20:46           ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 21:08             ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-19  3:07     ` Eric St-Laurent
2004-03-19 11:23       ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-19 13:35         ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1079624457.2136.26.camel@localhost \
    --to=rml@ximian.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjy@geizhals.at \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.