From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
To: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <PrakashKC@gmx.de>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@web.de>,
ross@datscreative.com.au,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1
Date: 19 Mar 2004 18:20:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1079738422.7279.308.camel@dhcppc4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <405B4893.70701@gmx.de>
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 14:22, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Hmm, I just did a cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power:
> active state: C1
> default state: C1
> bus master activity: 00000000
> states:
> *C1: promotion[--] demotion[--] latency[000]
> usage[00000000]
> C2: <not supported>
> C3: <not supported>
>
> I am currently NOT using APIC mode (nforce2, as well) and using vanilla
> 2.6.4. It seems C1 halt state isn't used, which exlains why I am having
> trouble to keep my CPU cooler these day. I once started a thread
> suspecting acpi timer, but it is not the case. It seems to be something
> else. As I don't use PIC, it cannot be that 8259-timer-ack-fix.patch
> causin git, or can it? Maybe something broken in ACPI? I might try out
> older kernels to find out...
>
> Prakash
Actually I think it is that we don't _count_ C1 usage.
cheers,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-19 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-18 0:19 idle Athlon with IOAPIC is 10C warmer since 2.6.3-bk1 Ross Dickson
2004-03-18 1:02 ` Craig Bradney
2004-03-18 11:41 ` Bernd Schubert
2004-03-18 11:55 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-19 18:55 ` Thomas Schlichter
2004-03-19 19:22 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-19 23:20 ` Len Brown [this message]
2004-03-20 9:29 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:19 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-20 10:25 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 10:50 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-29 19:59 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-30 0:57 ` Ross Dickson
2004-03-30 9:30 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-03-20 13:07 ` Daniel Egger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-17 21:26 Thomas Schlichter
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F571D@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-03-17 15:53 ` Len Brown
[not found] <200403032119.58817.thomas.schlichter@web.de>
2004-03-17 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-03-04 12:47 Thomas Schlichter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1079738422.7279.308.camel@dhcppc4 \
--to=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=PrakashKC@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=ross@datscreative.com.au \
--cc=thomas.schlichter@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.