From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: bug 2400 Date: 02 Apr 2004 19:16:31 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1080951392.1829.164.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040401131502.41136788.akpm@osdl.org> <1080862354.2118.78.camel@mulgrave> <1080949016.1804.161.camel@mulgrave> <20040403001105.GC1472@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:2728 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261400AbUDCARS (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:17:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040403001105.GC1472@us.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Anderson Cc: Andrew Morton , greg@kroah.com, Jens Axboe , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, SCSI Mailing List On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 19:11, Mike Anderson wrote: > It looks like cdrom_release always returns 0? Is there some other patch > outstanding that changes this. Yes, not that I know of. However, while it apparently has a return code indicating success or failure, we should respect it [unless Jens wants to make it a void function]. James