From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262585AbUDEOV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:21:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262602AbUDEOV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:21:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:28619 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262585AbUDEOVW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:21:22 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.x kernels and ttyS45 for 6 serial ports ? From: Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: arjanv@redhat.com To: Ruud Linders Cc: Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <40716855.50900@xs4all.nl> References: <4071367B.2060103@xs4all.nl> <20040405120452.B31038@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <40716855.50900@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dDopVvZMsjxRtPLIEouj" Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1081174866.4679.3.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7) Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 16:21:06 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-dDopVvZMsjxRtPLIEouj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 16:08, Ruud Linders wrote: > I realise that my 'patch' isn't the perfect solution. > But how much sense makes adding a 4-port card and getting > ttyS14/15/44/45 for these 4-ports ? does it matter really ???? (and if it does, why aren't you using udev ;) --=-dDopVvZMsjxRtPLIEouj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAcWtSxULwo51rQBIRAmtoAJ9lv+Tglxjq6TkJwzQ/EUOH98lQxwCeM0+z qN5j85RFTBIcBW5yHV/Fn8I= =V8C2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dDopVvZMsjxRtPLIEouj--