From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hancock.sc.steeleye.com (stat1.steeleye.com [65.114.3.130]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D715348BD for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:15:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: from midgard.sc.steeleye.com (midgard.sc.steeleye.com [172.17.6.40]) by hancock.sc.steeleye.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id i3CFFla24031; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:15:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: if something is not done, hppa will not have an installer for sarge From: James Bottomley To: Richard Hirst In-Reply-To: <20040412150556.GT20209@linuxcare.com> References: <20040411165459.GB11699@kitenet.net> <20040411171831.GA15032@mcmartin.ca> <20040411174629.GA12562@kitenet.net> <20040412111257.GS20209@linuxcare.com> <1081779569.1804.11.camel@mulgrave> <20040412150556.GT20209@linuxcare.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 12 Apr 2004 10:15:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1081782948.2234.26.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Kyle McMartin , debian-boot@lists.debian.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 10:05, Richard Hirst wrote: > Unbootable, or unbootable on 64 bit h/w? It seems to be unbootable entirely, but for 32 bit kernels that's random (sometimes it will, sometimes it won't). > > Unfortunately, palo is rather poor about checking this limit when > > installing the image or modifying the command line... > > and last time I tried building palo on a sid system to investigate > these hangs on boot, the result didn't work at all :( I think just reducing the command line would be the best option. Why's it so long? James