From: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Cc: Eli Cohen <mlxk@mellanox.co.il>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stack dumps, CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and i386 (was Re: sysrq shows impossible call stack)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:26:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082492730.716.76.camel@agtpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5265buzgfn.fsf_-_@topspin.com>
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 10:51, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Your question prompted me to look at show_trace() in
> arch/i386/kernel/traps.c. I see that even in kernels as new as 2.6.5,
> there is no attempt to use frame pointers for stack dumps even when
> CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is set. I seem to remember some patches to do
> this floating around a while ago. How did that discussion end up?
This problem was annoying me a few months ago so I coded up a stack
trace patch that actually uses the frame pointer. It is currently
maintained in -mjb but I have pasted below. Hope this helps.
diff -upN reference/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c current/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c
--- reference/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2004-04-09 11:53:00.000000000 -0700
+++ current/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c 2004-04-09 11:53:04.000000000 -0700
@@ -124,20 +124,62 @@ void breakpoint(void)
#define CHK_REMOTE_DEBUG(trapnr,signr,error_code,regs,after)
#endif
+#define STACK_PRINT_DEPTH 32
-static int kstack_depth_to_print = 24;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+#define valid_stack_ptr(task, p) \
+ ((p > (unsigned long)task->thread_info) && \
+ (p < (unsigned long)task->thread_info+THREAD_SIZE))
-void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long * stack)
+void show_stack_frame(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ printk(" ");
+ for (i = start; i < end; i += 4) {
+ if ((i - start) && ((i - start)%24 == 0))
+ printk("\n ");
+ printk("%08lx ", *(unsigned long *) i);
+ }
+ printk("\n");
+}
+
+void show_trace_fp(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long * stack)
+{
+ unsigned long addr, ebp;
+
+ if (!task)
+ task = current;
+
+ if (task == current) {
+ /* Grab ebp right from our regs */
+ asm ("movl %%ebp, %0" : "=r" (ebp) : );
+ } else {
+ /* ebp is the last reg pushed by switch_to */
+ ebp = *(unsigned long *) task->thread.esp;
+ }
+
+ show_stack_frame((unsigned long) stack, ebp+4);
+ while (valid_stack_ptr(task, ebp)) {
+ addr = *(unsigned long *) (ebp + 4);
+ printk(" [<%08lx>] ", addr);
+ print_symbol("%s\n", addr);
+
+ /* Show the stack frame starting with args */
+ show_stack_frame(ebp + 8, (*(unsigned long *) ebp) + 4);
+ ebp = *(unsigned long *) ebp;
+ }
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER */
+
+void show_trace_guess(unsigned long * stack)
{
unsigned long addr;
if (!stack)
stack = (unsigned long*)&stack;
- printk("Call Trace:");
-#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
- printk("\n");
-#endif
while (1) {
struct thread_info *context;
context = (struct thread_info*) ((unsigned long)stack & (~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)));
@@ -153,6 +195,20 @@ void show_trace(struct task_struct *task
break;
printk(" =======================\n");
}
+}
+#endif
+
+void show_trace(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long * stack)
+{
+ printk("Call Trace:");
+#ifdef CONFIG_KALLSYMS
+ printk("\n");
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
+ show_trace_fp(task, stack);
+#else
+ show_trace_guess(stack);
+#endif
printk("\n");
}
@@ -168,8 +224,10 @@ void show_trace_task(struct task_struct
void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *esp)
{
+#ifndef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
unsigned long *stack;
int i;
+#endif
if (esp == NULL) {
if (task)
@@ -178,8 +236,9 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task
esp = (unsigned long *)&esp;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
stack = esp;
- for(i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) {
+ for(i = 0; i < STACK_PRINT_DEPTH; i++) {
if (kstack_end(stack))
break;
if (i && ((i % 8) == 0))
@@ -187,6 +246,7 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task
printk("%08lx ", *stack++);
}
printk("\n");
+#endif
show_trace(task, esp);
}
--
Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com)
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-20 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-20 15:45 sysrq shows impossible call stack Eli Cohen
2004-04-20 16:26 ` Roland Dreier
2004-04-20 17:36 ` Eli Cohen
2004-04-20 17:51 ` stack dumps, CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER and i386 (was Re: sysrq shows impossible call stack) Roland Dreier
2004-04-20 20:26 ` Adam Litke [this message]
2004-04-21 0:12 ` Roland Dreier
2004-04-21 1:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-21 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-21 23:28 ` Adam Litke
2004-04-21 23:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 18:25 ` Adam Litke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082492730.716.76.camel@agtpad \
--to=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlxk@mellanox.co.il \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.