All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Walthinsen <omega@pdxcolo.net>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: 2.6.5 NFS ready for production?
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 10:38:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083001079.964.6.camel@localhost> (raw)

I'm trying to decide whether or not to even contemplate putting 2.6.5 on
our NAS server (single 2.4GHz Xeon, 512MB, 4x 200GB SATA on 3ware) to
gain the various I/O scheduling improvements, but obviously whether it's
even remotely possible depends primarily on whether NFS is up to it.

I have stock 2.6.5 on a test machine, and am getting *well* under
1MB/sec with bonnie++ over NFS on Gigabit (ttcp gets 18MB/sec, no jumbo
frames), compared to 20+MB/sec local (single old ATA disk).  Haven't
tried to pin down what precisely is causing the issue, but it begs the
question: should I even be considering 2.6's NFS as production-capable
yet?

TIA,

- Omega
  aka Erik Walthinsen
  omega@pdxcolo.net



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-26 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-26 17:38 Erik Walthinsen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-26 18:27 2.6.5 NFS ready for production? Lever, Charles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1083001079.964.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=omega@pdxcolo.net \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.