From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] nfs-acl
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:33:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1083087180.19655.263.camel@winden.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1083013819.15282.56.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 23:10, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 06:28, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Client nfsacl support
> >
> > Add support for the nfsacl protocol extension to nfs.
> >
>
> Why do we have to allocate an extra socket here? Can't we always assume
> that the NFSACL server will listen on port 2049 (the same as the NFS
> server)?
>
> If so, we can simply clone the NFS rpc_client in order to share the
> socket/security flavours/...
We can share the same socket, but the code gets slightly messier. How
about sharing the whole struct rpc_xprt (incremental patch)?
nfsacl-one-socket
-------------------------- 8< --------------------------
Index: linux-2.6.6-rc2/fs/nfs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.6-rc2.orig/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-27 17:43:30.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.6-rc2/fs/nfs/inode.c 2004-04-27 19:30:57.867697752 +0200
@@ -370,32 +370,38 @@
* Create an RPC client handle.
*/
static struct rpc_clnt *
-__nfs_create_client(struct nfs_server *server,
- const struct nfs_mount_data *data,
- struct rpc_program *program)
+nfs_create_client(struct nfs_server *server,
+ const struct nfs_mount_data *data,
+ struct rpc_program *program,
+ struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
{
- struct rpc_timeout timeparms;
- struct rpc_xprt *xprt = NULL;
struct rpc_clnt *clnt = NULL;
- int tcp = (data->flags & NFS_MOUNT_TCP);
- /* Initialize timeout values */
- timeparms.to_initval = data->timeo * HZ / 10;
- timeparms.to_retries = data->retrans;
- timeparms.to_maxval = tcp ? RPC_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT : RPC_MAX_UDP_TIMEOUT;
- timeparms.to_exponential = 1;
+ if (xprt)
+ xprt = xprt_get_handle(xprt);
+ else {
+ struct rpc_timeout timeparms;
+ int tcp = (data->flags & NFS_MOUNT_TCP);
+
+ /* Initialize timeout values */
+ timeparms.to_initval = data->timeo * HZ / 10;
+ timeparms.to_retries = data->retrans;
+ timeparms.to_maxval = tcp ? RPC_MAX_TCP_TIMEOUT :
+ RPC_MAX_UDP_TIMEOUT;
+ timeparms.to_exponential = 1;
- if (!timeparms.to_initval)
- timeparms.to_initval = (tcp ? 600 : 11) * HZ / 10;
- if (!timeparms.to_retries)
- timeparms.to_retries = 5;
-
- /* create transport and client */
- xprt = xprt_create_proto(tcp ? IPPROTO_TCP : IPPROTO_UDP,
- &server->addr, &timeparms);
- if (IS_ERR(xprt)) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "NFS: cannot create RPC transport.\n");
- return (struct rpc_clnt *)xprt;
+ if (!timeparms.to_initval)
+ timeparms.to_initval = (tcp ? 600 : 11) * HZ / 10;
+ if (!timeparms.to_retries)
+ timeparms.to_retries = 5;
+
+ /* create transport */
+ xprt = xprt_create_proto(tcp ? IPPROTO_TCP : IPPROTO_UDP,
+ &server->addr, &timeparms);
+ if (IS_ERR(xprt)) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "NFS: cannot create RPC transport.\n");
+ return (struct rpc_clnt *)xprt;
+ }
}
clnt = rpc_create_client(xprt, server->hostname, program,
server->rpc_ops->version, data->pseudoflavor);
@@ -416,12 +422,6 @@
return clnt;
}
-static struct rpc_clnt *
-nfs_create_client(struct nfs_server *server, const struct nfs_mount_data *data)
-{
- return __nfs_create_client(server, data, &nfs_program);
-}
-
/*
* The way this works is that the mount process passes a structure
* in the data argument which contains the server's IP address
@@ -482,13 +482,13 @@
/* XXX maybe we want to add a server->pseudoflavor field */
/* Create RPC client handles */
- server->client = nfs_create_client(server, data);
+ server->client = nfs_create_client(server, data, &nfs_program, NULL);
if (server->client == NULL)
goto out_fail;
#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_ACL
if (server->flags & NFS_MOUNT_VER3) {
- server->acl_client = __nfs_create_client(server, data,
- &nfsacl_program);
+ server->acl_client = nfs_create_client(server, data,
+ &nfsacl_program, server->client->cl_xprt);
if (server->acl_client == NULL)
goto out_shutdown;
/* Initially assume the nfsacl program is supported */
Index: linux-2.6.6-rc2/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.6-rc2.orig/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h 2004-04-20 23:29:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.6-rc2/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h 2004-04-27 17:44:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -194,12 +194,14 @@
void (*old_write_space)(struct sock *);
wait_queue_head_t cong_wait;
+ int used;
};
#ifdef __KERNEL__
struct rpc_xprt * xprt_create_proto(int proto, struct sockaddr_in *addr,
struct rpc_timeout *toparms);
+struct rpc_xprt * xprt_get_handle(struct rpc_xprt *);
int xprt_destroy(struct rpc_xprt *);
void xprt_shutdown(struct rpc_xprt *);
void xprt_default_timeout(struct rpc_timeout *, int);
Index: linux-2.6.6-rc2/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.6-rc2.orig/net/sunrpc/xprt.c 2004-04-27 17:42:38.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.6-rc2/net/sunrpc/xprt.c 2004-04-27 17:44:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -1430,6 +1430,7 @@
if ((xprt = kmalloc(sizeof(struct rpc_xprt), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
memset(xprt, 0, sizeof(*xprt)); /* Nnnngh! */
+ xprt->used = 1;
xprt->max_reqs = entries;
slot_table_size = entries * sizeof(xprt->slot[0]);
xprt->slot = kmalloc(slot_table_size, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1645,17 +1646,30 @@
}
/*
+ * Get another reference to an RPC transport.
+ */
+struct rpc_xprt *
+xprt_get_handle(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
+{
+ xprt->used++;
+ return xprt;
+}
+
+/*
* Destroy an RPC transport, killing off all requests.
*/
int
xprt_destroy(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
{
- dprintk("RPC: destroying transport %p\n", xprt);
- xprt_shutdown(xprt);
- xprt_disconnect(xprt);
- xprt_close(xprt);
- kfree(xprt->slot);
- kfree(xprt);
+ xprt->used--;
+ if (!xprt->used) {
+ dprintk("RPC: destroying transport %p\n", xprt);
+ xprt_shutdown(xprt);
+ xprt_disconnect(xprt);
+ xprt_close(xprt);
+ kfree(xprt->slot);
+ kfree(xprt);
+ }
return 0;
}
-------------------------- 8< --------------------------
> BTW: why does the client side NFS_ACL select QSORT? Can't userland do
> all that for us?
The server and client code both are using fs/nfsacl.c:nfsacl_decode()
for converting from the xdr_buf to the internal representation. We could
skip the qsort in the client case, but then the resulting struct
posix_acl * would not work in all possible contexts anymore, and who
knows where we will pass around acls in the future?
Thanks,
--
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX AG
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-27 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-26 10:28 [PATCH 11/11] nfs-acl Andreas Gruenbacher
2004-04-26 21:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-04-27 17:33 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2004-04-27 17:54 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1083087180.19655.263.camel@winden.suse.de \
--to=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.