From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 08/20] tracing: Warn if a tracepoint is not set via debugfs Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1083852821.1959.1394657227042.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20140307150920.881849073@goodmis.org> <20140312121813.1e0102aa@gandalf.local.home> <285520930.1511.1394642395537.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140312135059.2d497b58@gandalf.local.home> <1906756968.1732.1394650035535.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140312145802.4819511e@gandalf.local.home> <1177120325.1928.1394653861180.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <20140312203515.GV22728@two.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140312203515.GV22728@two.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Steven Rostedt , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrew Morton , Johannes Berg , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , lttng-dev , Rusty Russell List-Id: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andi Kleen" > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > Cc: "Steven Rostedt" , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo > Molnar" , "Frederic Weisbecker" , "Andrew Morton" , > "Johannes Berg" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Peter Zijlstra" > , "Thomas Gleixner" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , > "lttng-dev" , "Rusty Russell" , "Andi Kleen" > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 4:35:15 PM > Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 08/20] tracing: Warn if a tracepoint is not set via debugfs > > > So I understand that you wish to banish tracepoints from static inline > > functions within headers to ensure they only appear within a single module. > > This seems to be a step backward, but let's assume we stick to that rule. > > Then how do you envision dealing with Link-Time Optimisations (LTO) ? > > I assume it uses the file name defines set by Kbuild? Just to make sure I understand your question: I understand that you are asking whether tracepoints use file name defines at all in the naming of a tracepoint. The answer to this question is: No, they do not. > These don't change with > LTO. It's whatever was specified at compile time. Also LTO doesn't > inline over module boundaries (if the module is not built in) Good to know. Can it inline core kernel functions into a module ? Thanks, Mathieu > > -Andi > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com