All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John A. Sullivan III" <john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com>
To: "CPD - David Cardeñosa Rubio" <dcardenosa@cac.retecal.es>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Complex NAT problems /sorry for the formated text
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 10:07:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085062037.22574.5.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7528A97D83FBD411BEF40003471B905B05D8FF10@smtp.retecal.es>

On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 07:45, CPD - David Cardeñosa Rubio wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Hi 
> 
> I have a strage problem with iptables NAT 
> 
> I try to join 2 net with the same ip. 
> 
> 
> fwinet-2:~# iptables -L -n -t nat -v 
> Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 41232 packets, 2376K bytes) 
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
> destination 
>    94  4743 NETMAP     all  --  eth2   *       172.0.0.0/8         
> 172.20.4.0/24       172.16.4.0/24 
>     7   420 NETMAP     all  --  eth1   *       172.16.4.0/24       
> 172.20.3.0/24       172.16.33.0/24 
> 
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 21845 packets, 1167K bytes) 
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
> destination 
>     0     0 NETMAP     all  --  *      eth1    172.16.33.0/24      
> 172.16.4.0/24       172.20.3.0/24 
>   654 33367 NETMAP     all  --  *      eth2    172.16.4.0/24       
> 172.0.0.0/8         172.20.4.0/24 
>     0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth0    172.16.0.0/16       
> 0.0.0.0/0           to:192.168.8.6 
>     0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth0    172.40.40.0/22      
> 0.0.0.0/0           to:192.168.8.6 
>     0     0 SNAT       all  --  *      eth0    172.60.60.0/24      
> 0.0.0.0/0           to:192.168.8.6 
>   394 32515 SNAT       all  --  *      eth0    10.152.24.100       
> 0.0.0.0/0           to:192.168.8.6 
>     0     0 MASQUERADE  all  --  *      eth1    0.0.0.0/0           
> 172.16.4.14 
> 
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) 
>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
> destination 
> 
> 
> The 1º rule in POSTROUTING table don´t work, the packets go to the
> inteface eth1 with the original ip, i have the same problem for the
> other NETMAP rules(i also try with SNAT/DNAT) but when y reboot de
> firewall the rules apply correctly.
> 
> This only happend when modify the rules and no reboot, if reboot and
> load the firewall script (with the new rules) all work ok.
> 
> 
> fwinet-2:~# tcpdump -i eth2 -n icmp 
> tcpdump: listening on eth2 
> 13:25:38.157106 172.16.33.1 > 172.20.4.11: icmp: echo request 
> 13:25:39.158705 172.16.33.1 > 172.20.4.11: icmp: echo request 
> 
> fwinet-2:~# tcpdump -i eth1 -n icmp 
> tcpdump: listening on eth1 
> 13:25:43.163094 172.16.33.1 > 172.16.4.11: icmp: echo request 
> 
> It´s very strange. 
> 
> fwinet-2:~# uname -a 
> Linux fwinet-2 2.4.26 #2 Mon May 17 21:11:05 CEST 2004 i686 unknown 
<snip>
I can't give you an easy answer but I can suggest some process.  Have
you compared the rule listings before and after a change? Have you
placed logging rules within your rule set to see where the packets are
being unexpectedly accepted or dropped?
-- 
John A. Sullivan III
Chief Technology Officer
Nexus Management
+1 207-985-7880
john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com
---
If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class
VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit
http://iscs.sourceforge.net 



      reply	other threads:[~2004-05-20 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-20 11:45 Complex NAT problems /sorry for the formated text CPD - David Cardeñosa Rubio
2004-05-20 14:07 ` John A. Sullivan III [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1085062037.22574.5.camel@localhost \
    --to=john.sullivan@nexusmgmt.com \
    --cc=dcardenosa@cac.retecal.es \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.