From: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Karol Kozimor <sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ACPI Developers
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add C3 support to P4-M / ICH-M chipsets
Date: 20 May 2004 23:34:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085110450.12353.553.camel@dhcppc4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040518211431.GA17545-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 17:14, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> Now, for the tricky part:
>
> 1) Is it actually worth it? Do the power savings justify the effort? Are
> there many people who might benefit from this patch?
> 2) Are there any chances on merging such chipset-specific quirks?
> Obviously, not in the current form, but possibly as a separate object
> surrounded by pci_find_subsys() or anything appropriate?
Karol,
Good hunting ont he chip set spect etc.
But lets wait till after we have a _CST based implementation in place
and then see if the workarounds are still necessary then.
thanks,
-Len
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-21 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-18 21:14 [PATCH][RFC] Add C3 support to P4-M / ICH-M chipsets Karol Kozimor
[not found] ` <20040518211431.GA17545-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-21 3:34 ` Len Brown [this message]
[not found] ` <1085110450.12353.553.camel-D2Zvc0uNKG8@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-21 18:01 ` Bruno Ducrot
[not found] ` <20040521180155.GP29214-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-21 19:42 ` Karol Kozimor
[not found] ` <20040521194205.GA25863-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-24 10:11 ` Bruno Ducrot
[not found] ` <20040524101130.GB4387-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2004-05-24 10:59 ` Karol Kozimor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-26 3:06 Yu, Luming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085110450.12353.553.camel@dhcppc4 \
--to=len.brown-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.