From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: [PATCH] atapi request sense work Date: 21 May 2004 15:59:00 -0600 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1085176740.3199.12.camel@patibmrh9> References: <1084717146.3576.3.camel@patibmrh9> <40AD7FB2.10506@pobox.com><1 085153750.6103.33.camel@patibmrh9><200405211746.35015.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu. pl><1085162347.4791.24.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:3509 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266042AbUEUV7K (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 17:59:10 -0400 Received: from royntex01.iomegacorp.com (franklin [10.1.1.83]) by email.iomega.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92ED61E1C for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 15:59:09 -0600 (MDT) In-Reply-To: <1085162347.4791.24.camel@patibmrh9> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org > a trivial -bk8 patch that ducks ever trying PATAPI auto sense. bk8.good.always.patch is the name I have stored locally for that patch. > > Without auto sense, we read and write ok ... > > > > But when I try a no-data op x00 "TEST UNIT READY", I get: > > Well, it's a no-op on the ATA side, but not on the ATAPI side. > > Thanks for testing though, I'll think about this one a bit. I'm > surprised the interrupt wasn't handled correctly. Among our blogged results we of course still have the noise of brain-dead newbie errors by me. I'll roll back to vanilla -bk8, apply my bk8.good.always.patch, and reconfirm results of: # # host expects no data, device agrees sudo plscsi /dev/sg0 -v -X time 5 0 -x "12 00:00:00 00 00" sudo plscsi /dev/sg0 -v -X time 5 0 -x "00 00:00:00 00 00" # # host expects one block in, device actually sources no data sudo plscsi /dev/sg0 -v -X time 5 0 -i x800 -x "28 00 00:00:00:10 00 00:00 00" # # host expects one block out, device actually sinks no data sudo plscsi /dev/sg0 -v -X time 5 0 -o x800 -x "2A 00 00:00:00:10 00 00:00 00" Pat LaVarre