From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263389AbUEWTOU (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 15:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263415AbUEWTOU (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 15:14:20 -0400 Received: from DSL022.labridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:26636 "EHLO Perches.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263389AbUEWTOT (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2004 15:14:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission From: Joe Perches To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <40B0F4D5.5000807@pobox.com> References: <1085334933.8494.1448.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40B0F4D5.5000807@pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1085339577.8431.1460.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 12:12:57 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 12:00, Jeff Garzik wrote: > the patches generally appear > I usually send but sometimes don't. No fault of yours, just how it goes. > I specificially ask but don't require, etc. I think the more opportunity for review, the better. Coupling it to documented patch submission process might prove valuable. Cheers, Joe