From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 01:34:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1089070452.14870.2.camel@localhost>
References: <1089029792.7071.52.camel@localhost>
	 <20040705123032.GY4990@nysv.org>  <40E9AAE4.1020101@namesys.com>
Reply-To: redeeman@metanurb.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-19520-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <40E9AAE4.1020101@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Reiserfs Mailinglist <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 12:24 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote:
>=20
> >On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
> > =20
> >
> >>Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?
> >>   =20
> >>
> >
> >Afaik no.
> >
> >Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
> >freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
> >Although it was an old snapshot.
> >
> >The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
> >that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
> >
> >There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
> >
> > =20
> >
> After we send to -mm we will work on a mainline patch.
patch applies perfect on vanilla... maybe like 1 EASY EASY failed hunk,
which easily can be fixed. and it works perfect.
>=20
> Unfortunately I have to tell you that we are doing contract work for a=20
> customer not related to reiser4 in order to pay the bills, and for that=20
> reason reiser4 will most likely not get debugged this week.
>=20
> Hans
>=20
--=20
Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>