From: Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
To: Reiserfs Mailinglist <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Reiser4 / Reiserfs bonnie++ performance comparison
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 22:54:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089406483.10745.3.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040709165924.27fabe63@philou.gramoulle.local>
My benchmarks.. (if you can call it that)
reiser4
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m18.834s
user 0m14.785s
sys 0m2.516s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 0m12.936s
user 0m0.067s
sys 0m2.137s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m3.596s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m1.237s
-------------------------------------
reiserfs:
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m31.078s
user 0m15.232s
sys 0m2.099s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 0m50.763s
user 0m0.134s
sys 0m2.935s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m1.493s
user 0m0.013s
sys 0m0.722s
---------------------------------------
xfs
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m36.432s
user 0m15.202s
sys 0m1.727s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 1m10.314s
user 0m0.162s
sys 0m3.428s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m22.153s
user 0m0.042s
sys 0m1.618s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ext3
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m32.082s
user 0m15.190s
sys 0m1.519s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 0m39.479s
user 0m0.095s
sys 0m2.059s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m0.846s
user 0m0.012s
sys 0m0.369s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ext2
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m30.046s
user 0m15.165s
sys 0m1.025s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 0m18.344s
user 0m0.104s
sys 0m1.454s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m1.367s
user 0m0.009s
sys 0m0.226s
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fat32
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time tar -xjf /miscbinds/work/linux-
2.6.5.tar.bz2
real 0m45.634s
user 0m25.625s
sys 0m6.361s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time cp -a linux-2.6.5 linux
real 0m59.151s
user 0m9.098s
sys 0m17.761s
root@redeeman: /mnt/fstest# time rm -fr linux
real 0m2.449s
user 0m0.009s
sys 0m1.121s
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 16:59 +0200, Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Below are results from bonnie++ done on reiser4 and reiserfs.
> Each result is an average of 5 runs.
>
> For Reiser4 i used default mkfs options and -o formatting=extents
> For Reisefs i used default mount options and -o notails
>
> Assuming that default behavior of bonnie++ is to use twice the RAM of the server,
> no reboot was done between consecutive runs
>
> Bonnie++ was run like this : bonnie++ -x 5 -d bonnie
>
> Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2550 1GHz SMP, 1Go RAM, SCSI 15K RPM U160 Seagate Cheetah X15 Disk
> Software: Debian Sid + 2004.07.02 Reiser4 auto snapshot ( 2.6.7-mm4 )
> .config file available here if interested: http://philou.org/linux/reiser4/config-2.6.7-mm4
>
> Biggest regression seems to be in deletes.
>
> I will gladly redo my benchmarks if you feel i did or missed something obviously important,
> or you'd like me to test other FSes as well
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Philippe
>
> --
> Lycos Europe Noc
>
>
>
> Average of 5 runs with reiser4 ( no special mkfs options )
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> localbox 2G 15357 93 29126 24 17855 24 15994 93 40185 26 322 1
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 19839 99 +++++ +++ 7394 99.8 7632 100 +++++ +++ 7326 99.8
>
>
> Average of 5 runs with reiser4 ( mkfs option -o formatting=extents)
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> localbox 2G 15221 92 30467 25 17341 23 16059 94 40183 26 319 1
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 19728 99 +++++ +++ 7361 99.8 7576 99 +++++ +++ 7265 99.8
>
>
> Average of 5 runs with reiserfs ( no special mount options )
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> localbox 2G 16207 97 30432 30 16978 16 15100 91 38487 22 349 1
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 12433 99 +++++ +++ 10349 96 11836 99 +++++ +++ 9248 99.8
>
>
> Average of 5 runs with reiserfs ( mount option -o notails)
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> localbox 2G 16029 96 33199 33 16201 15 15226 91 38606 22 348 1
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 12423 99 +++++ +++ 10719 99 11767 99 +++++ +++ 9241 99.4
>
>
--
Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-09 14:59 Reiser4 / Reiserfs bonnie++ performance comparison Philippe Gramoullé
2004-07-09 15:24 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-09 15:41 ` Chris Humphries
2004-07-09 20:06 ` Marcelo Pacheco
2004-07-10 5:08 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-10 10:40 ` Mihai Rusu
2004-07-09 18:37 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-12 14:58 ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2004-07-09 20:54 ` Redeeman [this message]
2004-07-09 21:52 ` Dieter Nützel
2004-07-09 22:06 ` Redeeman
2004-07-10 5:17 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089406483.10745.3.camel@localhost \
--to=redeeman@metanurb.dk \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.