From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: 2.6.4-rc1-pa3 siimage/NS87415 IDE progess (and another mystery)! Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:44:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1089661444.11710.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20040309063629.GM1113@tausq.org> <20040309072917.GN1113@tausq.org> <20040711221829.GA27835@colo.lackof.org> <20040711231401.GW546@tausq.org> <20040711233439.GX546@tausq.org> <20040712033752.GA10163@sal.ucc.ie> <20040712041935.GA10211@sal.ucc.ie> <20040712161444.GB12046@colo.lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org To: Grant Grundler Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20040712161444.GB12046@colo.lackof.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Llu, 2004-07-12 at 17:14, Grant Grundler wrote: > > Is > > 'hdparm -c 1' (enable 32bit I/O) > > and > > 'hdparm -u 1' (unmasq_irq) > > useful/implemented on PA-RISC? > > I don't think this is platform specific. > I expect both of those to be card/driver specific. Both are implemented in the core code. In the case of -c 1 it isnt going to do anything relevant. -u 1 ought to have little effect in DMA modes _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux