From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [2002:c1ed:8229::1] (helo=baythorne.infradead.org)
	by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1BkdRz-0008I5-GU
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:41:08 -0400
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind?= Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
In-Reply-To: <1089786408.7607.4.camel@famine>
References: <1089728296.6288.19.camel@famine>
	<1089760454.8822.23.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk>
	<1089786408.7607.4.camel@famine>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <1089787265.8822.31.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 07:41:05 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Prune obsolete raw_node_ref's from RAM
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 08:26 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Would all the performance problems go away if the lists were doubly
> linked?

Well yes, but since the object of the exercise was to save memory,
doubling the size of the objects in question doesn't really strike me as
being the right way to approach the problem :)

-- 
dwmw2