From: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix cdrom mt rainier probe
Date: 16 Jul 2004 09:58:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1089993519.7028.26.camel@patibmrh9> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040716122845.GE2025@suse.de>
Jens A:
> cdrom_open ... transposing the two checks ...
> cdrom_decode_status ... set_disk_ro ... needs to go ... unless ...
> ide_cdrom_setup ...
> get_capabilities ... These are fine.
This e-mail ends with that four part patch you describe, thank you for
those clear instructions.
I also specifically confirmed that deleting rq_data_dir has no side
effect:
$ grep rq_data_dir include/linux/*
include/linux/blkdev.h:#define rq_data_dir(rq) ((rq)->flags & 1)
$
> Now that CDC_RAM is a per-media capability flag, it doesn't make sense
> to set/clear it on every open when you can just return ok or not.
Agreed.
I had suggested always trying a fetch of mode page x2A "Capabilities"
before op x46 "GET CONFIGURATION" out of fear of legacy DVD/ CD choking
over the new op.
I see in the release early often spirit we can try simplifying our host
code first and waiting for someone to complain, maybe no one ever
actually will.
> > + if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_RAM))
> > + goto err;
> ...
> > if (cdrom_open_write(cdi))
> ...
> This looks strange -
> cdrom_open_write() is the one that checks whether
> the media is suitable for writing or not
Agreed.
Me thinking like this is why I don't understand how CDC_RAM ever got set
in my patched PATAPI code. But since we're abandoning CDC_RAM, I won't
analyse that mystery further, unless you tell me I should.
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:28:45 +0200
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:25:55 +0200
Ouch I was asleep then. (: I need to route my e-mail to my phone. :)
Pat LaVarre
diff -urp linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c 2004-07-13 08:26:02.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c 2004-07-16 09:40:22.765020896 -0600
@@ -897,10 +897,10 @@ int cdrom_open(struct cdrom_device_info
goto err;
if (fp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) {
ret = -EROFS;
- if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_RAM))
- goto err;
if (cdrom_open_write(cdi))
goto err;
+ if (!CDROM_CAN(CDC_RAM))
+ goto err;
ret = 0;
}
}
diff -urp linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c 2004-07-13 08:26:05.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c 2004-07-16 09:37:07.613688408 -0600
@@ -785,14 +785,6 @@ static int cdrom_decode_status(ide_drive
do_end_request = 1;
} else if (sense_key == ILLEGAL_REQUEST ||
sense_key == DATA_PROTECT) {
- /*
- * check if this was a write protected media
- */
- if (rq_data_dir(rq) == WRITE) {
- printk("ide-cd: media marked write protected\n");
- set_disk_ro(drive->disk, 1);
- }
-
/* No point in retrying after an illegal
request or data protect error.*/
ide_dump_status (drive, "command error", stat);
@@ -3248,9 +3240,8 @@ int ide_cdrom_setup (ide_drive_t *drive)
nslots = ide_cdrom_probe_capabilities (drive);
/*
- * set correct block size and read-only for non-ram media
+ * set correct block size
*/
- set_disk_ro(drive->disk, !CDROM_CONFIG_FLAGS(drive)->ram);
blk_queue_hardsect_size(drive->queue, CD_FRAMESIZE);
#if 0
diff -urp linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/scsi/sr.c linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/scsi/sr.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc1/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-07-13 08:26:16.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc1-pel/drivers/scsi/sr.c 2004-07-15 14:29:34.000000000 -0600
@@ -775,9 +775,6 @@ static void get_capabilities(struct scsi
""
};
- /* Set read only initially */
- set_disk_ro(cd->disk, 1);
-
/* allocate a request for the TEST_UNIT_READY */
SRpnt = scsi_allocate_request(cd->device, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!SRpnt) {
@@ -885,7 +882,6 @@ static void get_capabilities(struct scsi
if ((cd->cdi.mask & (CDC_DVD_RAM | CDC_MRW_W | CDC_RAM)) !=
(CDC_DVD_RAM | CDC_MRW_W | CDC_RAM)) {
cd->device->writeable = 1;
- set_disk_ro(cd->disk, 0);
}
scsi_release_request(SRpnt);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-16 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-13 17:57 [PATCH] fix cdrom mt rainier probe Pat LaVarre
2004-07-13 20:55 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-07-14 5:41 ` Jens Axboe
2004-07-14 23:34 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-07-16 0:39 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-07-16 12:25 ` Jens Axboe
2004-07-16 12:28 ` Jens Axboe
2004-07-16 15:58 ` Pat LaVarre [this message]
2004-07-16 16:02 ` Jens Axboe
2004-07-16 16:19 ` Pat LaVarre
2004-07-16 17:51 ` Jens Axboe
2004-07-18 0:43 ` Pat LaVarre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1089993519.7028.26.camel@patibmrh9 \
--to=p.lavarre@ieee.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.