From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>,
"Jeffrey E. Hundstad" <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>,
linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com,
Cahya Wirawan <cwirawan@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:46:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1091101612.2792.8.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040729114219.GN2349@fs.tum.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 647 bytes --]
> > > Mark this combination as BROKEN until XFS is fixed.
> >
> > This part is not useful. We want to hear about problems
> > that people hit with 4K stacks so we can try to address
> > them, and it mostly works as is.
>
> 2.6 is a stable kernel series used in production environments.
>
> Regarding Linus' tree, it's IMHO the best solution to work around it
> this way until all issues are sorted out.
>
> Feel free to revert it in -mm later, since there are many brave souls
> running -mm you'll still get to hear about problems.
can you then also mark XFS broken in 2.4 entirely?
2.4 has a nett stack of also 4Kb...
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 11:44 4K stack kernel get Oops in Filesystem stress test Cahya Wirawan
2004-07-20 12:04 ` Steve Lord
2004-07-20 14:39 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2004-07-20 19:50 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n Adrian Bunk
2004-07-20 20:42 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-20 20:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-20 20:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-29 6:09 ` Nathan Scott
2004-07-29 11:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 11:46 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-07-29 21:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 21:44 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-29 22:30 ` [xfs-masters] " Nathan Scott
2004-08-01 19:02 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 15:42 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n Mika Bostrom
2004-07-29 16:09 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-07-29 16:36 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS Mika Bostrom
2004-07-22 7:27 ` 4K stack kernel get Oops in Filesystem stress test Amon Ott
2004-07-29 2:14 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1091101612.2792.8.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=cwirawan@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=lord@xfs.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.