From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:01:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1091142091.2703.54.camel@desktop.cunninghams> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091141832.2114.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Hi.
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:57, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> Well, I've tried the kthread freezer patch against 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 and it
> works fine. However, with kthread freezer applied, suspending and
> resuming is much slower (around 5 seconds slower). Thus, I guess all my
> problems must be related to some specific patch I'm applying against the
> current -bk tree.
Okay. That might be due to the treatment of ksoftirqd, which Pavel and I
have agreed needs changing.
> I'll keep investigating this issue, but I think voluntary-preempt might
> have some strange interactions with these kthread changes.
Me too, when I get a chance. I'm running rc2-mm1 now, and it seems okay.
Especially since I turned off USB 2 support in the BIOS :>
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-29 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 7:22 [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-28 22:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:30 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-28 22:27 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-28 23:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 10:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 12:11 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 16:10 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 22:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 8:12 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 22:57 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-29 23:01 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2004-07-29 19:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:24 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 22:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-29 22:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-29 23:25 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags (Version 2) Nigel Cunningham
2004-07-30 9:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-31 16:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-07-30 12:11 ` [Patch] Per kthread freezer flags Peter Osterlund
2004-07-30 22:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1091142091.2703.54.camel@desktop.cunninghams \
--to=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.