From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264531AbUG3Xji (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:39:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267872AbUG3Xji (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:39:38 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:32935 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264531AbUG3Xja (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:39:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Exposing ROM's though sysfs From: Alan Cox To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Jon Smirl , Torrey Hoffman , lkml In-Reply-To: <200407301326.48094.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> References: <1091207136.2762.181.camel@rohan.arnor.net> <20040730172433.2312.qmail@web14924.mail.yahoo.com> <20040730191448.GA2461@ucw.cz> <200407301326.48094.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1091226981.5066.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:36:22 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2004-07-30 at 21:26, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Friday, July 30, 2004 12:14 pm, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > I'm starting to think that using emu86 always (independent on the > > architecture) would be best. It's not like the execution speed is the > > limit with video init, and it'll allow to find more bugs in emu86 when > > it's used on i386 as well. It'll be needed for x86-64 (AMD64 and intel > > EM64T) anyway. > > Yeah, I was thinking the same thing, but emu86 needs some fixes to work on an > x86 host apparently... emu86 is rather buggy. It can't boot C&T BIOSes for example. qemu might be a better engine for this anyway in truth.