From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267872AbUG3XpI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:45:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267868AbUG3XpH (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:45:07 -0400 Received: from the-village.bc.nu ([81.2.110.252]:37543 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267872AbUG3XpB (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:45:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Exposing ROM's though sysfs From: Alan Cox To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Vojtech Pavlik , Jon Smirl , lkml In-Reply-To: <200407301320.19892.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> References: <20040730193546.GA328@ucw.cz> <20040730194150.7072.qmail@web14927.mail.yahoo.com> <20040730194854.GA436@ucw.cz> <200407301320.19892.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1091227263.5054.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:41:06 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Gwe, 2004-07-30 at 21:20, Jesse Barnes wrote: > I think Martin's suggestion of just caching them all at probe time (or > optionally at driver attach time) is probably the simplest and easiest to get > right. It could be controllable via a boot time parameter. But I'm not > entirely opposed to using pci quirks. You guys just have *too* much RAM.